46. 418 N.J. Super. 262 (App. Div.
2011). In N.H., the parties agreed in their matrimonial settlement agreement (MSA)
that they would be bound by the recommendations of Charles Katz, Ph.D. regarding custody and parenting time.
The appellate panel concluded that Katz served in the role as an arbitrator and that the parties were in the pipeline
because at the time the family part decided the MSA’s enforceability, the parties were still litigating their dispute.
Id.
at 285-88.
47. 219 N.J. 565 (2014).
48. Id.
49. Id. (quoting L.
2009, c. 311, § 2).
50. Id.
51. 442 N.J. Super.
529, 539 (App. Div. 2015).
52. Quinn v.
Quinn, __ N.J. __ (2016).
53. Id. (emphasis added).
54. Id.
55. 158 N.J.
185 (1999).
56. Id. (emphasis added).
57. Quinn, supra, (quoting Konzelman, supra, 158 N.J. at 203.” (emphasis added)).
58. N.J.S.A.
2A:34-23(n) (emphasis added).
59. N.J.S.A. 23:34-25 (emphasis added).
60. Gnall v. Gnall, 222 N.J.
414 ( 2015).
New Jersey State Bar Association New Jersey Family Lawyer
Go to
43 Index
.