1) Commentary BARROW October 2016 FUNDS Barrow Street Advisors Leadership Nicholas Chermayeff Principal  25 years of industry experience   BA Harvard College  Robert F. Greenhill, Jr. Principal  26 years of industry experience   BA Harvard College  MBA Harvard Business School  David R. Bechtel Principal  26 years of industry experience  BA Yale University  JD Stanford Law School  Anticipating a Comeback in Value Principals Nicholas Chermayeff, Robert Greenhill Jr. and David Bechtel provide their current perspective on the Barrow Funds. 1 With Barrow’s focus on Quality and Value in stock selection, what have been the  challenges of this approach over the past three years? At Barrow Funds, we focus on finding high quality, stable businesses that possess the following business characteristics:  Strong top line growth, as the market should reprice the stock higher as the company grows  High returns on capital and ample cash flow, enabling companies to reinvest cash to fuel growth  Low debt levels, as low leverage generally makes companies resilient to future economic challenges About Barrow Street Barrow Street Advisors LLC is a registered investment advisor and is an affiliate of Barrow Street Capital LLC which is an investment management firm that manages value-oriented private and public equity strategies. Headquartered in Stamford, CT the firm serves pension funds, sovereign funds, endowments, foundations, family offices and high net worth individuals. Since its inception, Barrow Street Advisors LLC and Barrow Street Capital LLC have invested approximately $550 million, cumulatively, of equity in private and public equity strategies. For More Information (203) 391-6100 barrowfunds.com  Management teams with a high degree of ownership, as they tend to be highly motivated and well-aligned with investors’ interests We seek to purchase these companies at what we believe are substantial discounts to their intrinsic values. This timeless investment philosophy can run counter to short-term market rallies. Often, investors are influenced by macroeconomic and global geopolitical factors as well as the extreme intervention of central bank policies. These extrinsic forces often have little to do with the quality and value of an individual company. While macro events present a challenge, we remain patient and focused on the intrinsic value and quality of the company regardless of the market’s reaction. Our conviction has been occasionally tested, but we believe our patience and diligence will be rewarded over the long term. 2 Merger and acquisition (M&A) activity has historically been an important driver  performance for Barrow Funds. Would you please discuss the current level of of activity? Overall, M&A volume and dollar value have declined on a year-to-date basis in 2016 compared to historical periods. While M&A activity tends to be cyclical, the slowdown takes the wind out of the market as fewer buyers are willing to pay premiums for publicly traded stocks. Regardless of the slowdown in transactions, we anticipate M&A activity will continue to be robust. Private equity funds currently have $1.3 trillion in cash—an all-time annual high since 2000—and a significant portion of that “dry powder” can be spent on buyouts. With an unrealized $2.8 trillion portfolio value, private equity has a significant market presence with respect to M&A activity. (continued on next page) 

2) Commentary BARROW FUNDS October 2016 3 How has current M&A activity impacted the holdings of the Barrow Funds? We take a private equity approach to investing, viewing the Funds’ holdings as ownership interests in underlying businesses. Due to this approach, we often spot attractive entry levels in companies that later get identified as M&A targets. In fact, since the Barrow Value Opportunity Fund’s inception on Barrow Value Opportunity Fund – Holdings Takeover Timeline December 31, 2008 through the end of January 2009 - November 2016 September 2016, the Fund has experienced approximately three times the level of takeover activity compared to the broader market. At Barrow, we take a private equity view of companies that we believe are undervalued and have the potential to be acquired by others. This timeline shows the companies in our Fund’s portfolio that have been the target of M&A activity since the Fund’s inception on 12/31/08.* The activity continues through the third quarter of 2016: In September, the Fund experienced the seventh takeout of 2016 when German chemical company Lanxess purchased U.S.-based Chemtura (CHMT) at a 19% premium to the stock’s closing price at the time of announcement. ANNOUNCE DATE Jan 2009 July 2009 Jan 2010 July 2010 Jan 2011 July 2011 Jan 2012 July 2012 Jan 2013 July 2013 Jan 2014 July 2014 Jan 2015 July 2015 Jan 2016 July 2016 *Participation in a Fund with M&A activity does not guarantee positive returns for the Fund. The M&A activity includes that of the Barrow Value Opportunity Fund’s predecessor entity, Barrow Street Fund L.P., an unregistered limited partnership that was reorganized into the Institutional Class of the Fund on August 30, 2013. The Fund has been managed in the same style and by the same portfolio managers since the Predecessor Private Fund’s inception on December 31, 2008. Past performance does not guarantee future results. A historical list of complete takeovers can be found on barrowfunds.com 4 With growth stocks outperforming value stocks for multiple years in a row, what might indicate a market  leadership shift? Returns of growth and value stocks have historically been cyclical, with consecutive years of outperformance by growth stocks followed by strong periods of performance by value stocks. As shown in the charts below, large- and small-cap value appear poised to outperform growth companies, as the difference between the trailing 10-year returns of growth and value stocks in both the small and large cap market have hit a 15-year peak. To Barrow Funds, we believe this peak period of underperformance by value stocks indicates a bright future ahead for value investors. large-cap growth vs. value small-cap growth vs. value Annualized Trailing 10-Year Relative Total Return Russell 1000 Growth - Russell 1000 Value Avg. Annualized Trailing 10-Year Relative Total Return +2 StDev. -2 StDev. Avg. Russell 2000 Growth - Russell 2000 Value 8% 6% +2 StDev. -2 StDev. 4% 2% 4% 3.0% 2% 2.4% 0% -2% 0% -4% -2% -6% -4% -8% -6% -10% -8% -10% -12% ‘88 ‘91 ‘94 ‘97 ‘00 ‘03 ‘06 ‘09 ‘12 ‘15 -14% ‘88 ‘91 ‘94 ‘97 ‘00 ‘03 ‘06 ‘09 ‘12 ‘15 Source: Strategas Research Partners Important Information Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. The Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Fund and may be obtained by calling 1-877-767-6633. Read it carefully before investing. Distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC. Performance data quoted represents past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results. Investment in the Funds are subject to stock market risk, large-cap risk, mid-cap risk, small-cap risk, exchange traded funds risk, management style risk, value investing risk, and short sale risk (including more information about the risks listed above), please read the prospectus. As of 9/30/16, the Fund held 0.00% in net assets of Lanxess. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security. The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of companies in the Russell 1000 Index considered to have a greater than average growth orientation. The Russell 1000 Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of companies in the Russell 1000 Index considered to have less than average growth orientation. The Russell 2000 Growth Index is a capitalization weighted broad based index of 2,000 small capitalization US stocks considered to have a greater than average growth orientation. The Russell 2000 Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of companies in the Russell 2000 Index with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. It is not possible to invest directly in indexes which are unmanaged and do not incur fees and charges.