Place-Based Investing
and the Role of the
Impact Investor
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Table of Contents
Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................3
Place-Based Investing .............................................................................................................................................4
The Life Cycle of Place-Based Investments and CCM’s Role ..................................................................................5
CCM Place-Based Investing Examples ...................................................................................................................7
Via Verde........................................................................................................................................7
Westhaven Park IIC .......................................................................................................................8
Hotel Oakland ...............................................................................................................................9
Newberry Hall .............................................................................................................................10
Conclusion ...........................................................................................................................................................11
Community Capital Management, Inc. is a Florida-based investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The securities identiï¬ed and described herein are current holdings
and for illustrative purposes. Their selection was based upon non-performance criteria, such as the security’s social and/or
environmental attributes.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions can vary widely over time
and can result in a loss of portfolio value.
2
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Introduction
According to the Center for the Study of Social Policy,
research and experience shows that families do better
when they live in strong and supportive communities. In short, place matters. Yet many communities
face challenges of high poverty, unemployment, failing
schools, and housing instability. Increasingly, funders
and federal officials are focusing their investments on
place-based efforts to improve outcomes for families.¹
Some of these efforts have included urban renewal
programs, loans and grants motivated by the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), housing development
through HOPE VI, Empowerment Zones, New Markets Tax Credit investments as well as foundation-led
comprehensive community initiatives and local nonproï¬t ventures.
The most ambitious of these initiatives
have aimed to concentrate multiple investments from
public and private sources in both infrastructure and
human capital in a single neighborhood.²
venture — has been unable to secure ï¬nancing from
traditional sources,”³ according to the Foundation
Center. Most often deployed for projects relating to
housing development and other community investment ventures, PRIs have the additional beneï¬t of offering recipients access to capital at lower rates than can
be secured from a traditional lender.
For impact investors willing to accept below-market
returns, community development ï¬nancial institutions (CDFIs) provide credit and capital, as well as ï¬nancial services, to underserved populations and communities. CDFIs are located in the areas they serve and
are able to recognize and respond to the needs of their
communities.
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, created by the US Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) in 1997, is a tax credit
mechanism available to impact investors.
Described
by HUD as “the most important resource for creating
affordable housing in the United States,” the LIHTC
program gives allocating agencies “the equivalent of
nearly $8 billion in annual budget authority to issue
tax credits for the acquisition, rehabilitation or new
construction of rental housing targeted to lower-income households.”â´
Place-based investment allows a focus on speciï¬c needs
and opportunities while letting supporters provide funding from appropriate sources, such as but not limited to:
Established by Congress in 2000, the New Markets
Tax Credit Program (NMTC) “attracts investment
capital to low-income communities by permitting individual and corporate investors to receive a tax credit against their Federal income tax return in exchange
for making equity investments in specialized ï¬nancial
institutions called Community Development Entities
(CDEs).”âµ
For foundations, program-related investments (PRIs)
offer “a supplement to their existing grant programs
when the circumstances of the request suggest an alternative form of ï¬nancing, when the borrower has the
potential for generating income to repay a loan, and
as a last resort when an organization — in most cases
a charitable nonproï¬t but occasionally a commercial
In addition to the investment opportunities outlined
above, there exists for impact investors speciï¬c investment vehicles and intermediaries allowing for both
fulï¬llment of place-based and ï¬nancial returns. Community Capital Management (CCM) is one such manager, investing in market-rate ï¬xed income impact investments since 1999.
¹http://www.cssp.org/community/neighborhood-investment/place-based-initiatives
²http://www.frbsf.org/community-development/ï¬les/N_Cytron.pdf
³http://grantspace.org/tools/knowledge-base/Grantmakers/pris
â´http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/lihtc.html
âµhttp://www.cdï¬fund.gov/what_we_do/programs_id.asp?programID=5
3
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Place-Based Investing
Place-based investing, which as the name implies is a
site-speciï¬c subset of impact investing, is deï¬ned by
Confluence Philanthropy as “committing capital to local businesses, ï¬nancial institutions, infrastructure or
nonproï¬ts, with an expectation of ï¬nancial return.”â¶
It has quickly become a favored strategy among impact
investors.
Either way, there are a multitude of local, community
beneï¬ts that can be achieved as a result of place-based
investing. These include but are not limited to: job
creation, social mobility, revitalization, smart growth,
affordable housing, small business development, education and so many more.
Place-based investors are commonly foundations, religious organizations, and high-net-worth investors
seeking to meet their missions through alternatives to
traditional philanthropy. Some public pension plans
have a local investment goal, while others are considering adopting one.
While philanthropy remains an important component
for foundations since they are required by law to provide at least 5% of their assets in grants every year,â·
impact investment strategies allow for greater flexibility
as well as the potential for ï¬nancial returns.
Place-based investing offers the chance to spotlight collaborative efforts that can result in better economics
and better community outcomes. In some cases, a single project or targeted community may receive funding
from one or multiple sources.
According to the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), impact investments are investments made into companies, organizations and
funds with the intention to generate social and
environmental impact alongside a ï¬nancial return.
They can be made in both emerging and
developed markets, and target a range of returns
from below market to market rate, depending on
the circumstances.
There are a multitude of local, community beneï¬ts that
can be achieved as a result of place-based investing such
as, but not limited to: job creation, revitalization, smart
growth and affordable housing.
â¶ http://www.confluencephilanthropy.org/content/common/common.download_ï¬le.php?action_special=download_ï¬le&sid=3c86770
e3cc479b8ff8b9e346762d97e&download_ï¬le_id=394392
â· http://www.mcf.org/publictrust/faq_payout
4
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
The Life Cycle of Place-Based Investments
and CCM’s Role
While each place-based investment opportunity has unique characteristics, there are certain themes that tend to be
repeated in the life cycles and evolution of the investments that end up in CCM’s client portfolios:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
First, the private or public sector funds and builds a property for market-related use that is appropriate
at time of construction.
Second, with the passage of time and changes in neighborhoods and local economies, a property’s original purpose is no longer relevant or economically viable.
Third, subsequent neglect and sometimes abandonment create an eyesore, safety hazard and contribute
to decline in property values and become part of a negative spiral for communities and residents.
Fourth, government planners and foundation-supported entities seek to craft a repurpose and rehabilitation strategy that will return property to fuller use and be part of overall revitalization goals.
Fifth, a winning plan emerges and the scramble to put together ï¬nancing packages begins. Public agencies and/or foundations spend money to create an opportunity that will attract private capital.
Sixth, construction and rehab occur, frequently with grants, program-related investments (PRIs) or foundation support for non-proï¬t partners, available subsidies are drawn and a property is ready to return to
the market with a new purpose. Banks and construction lenders will play a part.
Seventh, a permanent ï¬nancing takeout whereby a patient capital long-term investor will own a mortgage or similar investment instrument on the reincarnated property.
This is where CCM’s role comes into play
– the long-term patient capital.
5
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Each of the revitalization stages is dependent upon the
others for success. None can triumph unless all are involved and available.
CCM tends to invest in the ï¬nal stage as that is the
best risk-adjusted match for our clients’ investment
objectives. Many of our clients, especially foundations,
are involved in earlier chapters with grants, PRIs or in
other various ways.
Connecting the dots of place-based investing can help
all participants work more efficiently and with a better
understanding of the entire process. As one can well
imagine, coordinating the ï¬nancing from such disparate and multiple sources can be challenging when
it comes to such ambitious projects as the rehabilita-
tion of multifamily housing developments in low- and
middle-income urban neighborhoods.
Capital sources
may be siloed and partnerships are essential for projects
whose costs can run to millions of dollars.
It is testimony to the overarching social and environmental mission of impact investors that many of these
ambitious projects come to fruition. Documented successes provide assurance that it can be done and the
involvement of impact investors in the process helps
contribute to successful outcomes.
What follows on the next couple of pages are case studies
of several urban housing redevelopment projects, along
with their ï¬nancing sources. CCM’s role in each case
study is as part of the long term patient capital takeout.
CCM tends to invest in the ï¬nal stage as that is
the best risk-adjusted match for our clients’ investment
objectives.
Many of our clients, especially foundations,
are involved in earlier chapters with grants, PRIs
or in other various ways.
6
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
CCM Place-Based Investing Examples
Via Verde, Bronx, New York
Located on the site of a brownï¬eld in the South
Bronx, Via Verde includes 222 mixed-income residential units, 7,500 square feet of retail and community
space and 40,000 square feet of green roofs and other
open space for residents. It achieved LEED Gold Certiï¬cation from the U.S. Green Building Council for its
innovative environmentally responsible design.â¸
The primary goal of the $98.8 million project was to
provide a mix of rental and homeownership opportunities for people at a range of income levels to encourage a mixed-income community. Another goal was
addressing community health issues such as childhood
asthma and obesity, attributable in part to the lack of
opportunities for exercise and healthy eating.
Via Verde was ï¬nanced by grants, loans, tax credit, and other funding mechanisms from a total of
19 public, private, and nonproï¬t funding sources.
The development was ï¬nanced in two parts—the
co-op portion and the rental portion.
The 1.5-acre site
was conveyed to the development team by the New
York City Department of Housing Preservation and
Development (HPD) for $1 to help subsidize the affordability of the project.
Photo © David Sundberg/Esto. Architect: Dattner.
Nearly $32 million was required for development of
71 units of co-op housing that are designated for middle-income households. Construction was ï¬nanced
through taxable bonds from the New York City
Housing Development Corporation (HDC)—which,
during construction, were sustained in part by a JP
Morgan Chase line of credit—along with subsidies
from HDC, HPD, the Bronx borough president’s ofï¬ce, the New York City Council, the New York State
Affordable Housing Corporation, and the New York
State Energy Research and Development Authority
(NYSERDA).
For the co-op portion, the developer
provided $1.675 million in equity and an additional
$1.5 million in the form of a deferred developer fee,
which was returned to the developer when permanent
ï¬nancing was secured.â¹ The two developers on the
original development team – Phipps House and Jonathan Rose Companies – were equal partners in the
project. The two architects were Dattner Architects
and Grimshaw Architects.
⸠http://www.usgbc.org/projects/verde-green-way
â¹ http://uli.org/case-study/uli-case-studies-via-verde/
7
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Westhaven Park IIC, Chicago, Illinois
In 1987, The New York Times entitled an article about
the Henry Horner Homes projects in Chicago, “What
It’s Like To Be In Hell”. “Gangs engage in regular and
constant warfare for control of the drug and vice trades,”
the article stated. “Children dodge machine-gun crossï¬re as they leave the school.”
In 1991, Alex Kotlowitz wrote a book, There are no
Children Here, chronicling two years in the lives of
two boys struggling to survive in the Henry Horner
Homes. The public housing project consisted of 16
high-rise buildings along with low-rise buildings of
920 units; in 1961, an extension added several hundred more multi-story units.
The buildings were demolished in 2008.
Photo credit: Landon Bone Baker Architects (Before: Henry Horner Homes)
Replacing the projects, Westhaven Park was developed
with the ï¬nancial assistance of Low Income Housing
Tax Credits and the HOME Investment Partnership
Program (HOME). The property was built using the
Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program, receiving
a tax credit allocation in 2006 for $1,500,000 with a
10 year value of $15,000,000. The property was further ï¬nanced through HOME, and 97 of the 127 units
are assisted through $6.5 million from the HOME
program.¹â°
Westhaven Park includes a large park; commercial
storefront spaces; and on-site maintenance and community rooms that provide supportive services such as
employment, job and childcare training, health and
homeownership counseling and environmental sustainable education.¹¹
Westhaven Park IIC, one of the buildings in the community, exceeds both the City of Chicago’s Green
Photo credit: Shane Welch Photography (After: Westhaven Park IIC)
Homes and the Illinois Housing Development Authority’s Green Housing Initiative requirements, and
all buildings are Energy Star certiï¬ed.
¹â° http://affordablehousingonline.com/housing-search/Illinois/Chicago/Westhaven-Park-Iic/75286/
¹¹ http://landonbonebaker.com/urban-design/westhaven-park/westhaven-park-phase-2c/
8
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
.
PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Hotel Oakland, Oakland, California
Original construction of Hotel Oakland was completed in 1912. Designed as a luxury hotel (much of the
hotel remains listed on the National Register of Historic Spaces), it has been described as “a prominent
social center” during the decade that followed completion of original construction; among its guests were
US Presidents Wilson, Coolidge and Hoover.¹²
Photo credit: Rachel Welles Photography
During the 1930s, the hotel fell into disrepair and was
later used from 1943 to 1963 as a Veterans’ Administration hospital. For the next 15 years, it stood vacant.
In 1978, it was purchased by a Boston-based developer who remodeled it into a housing project for the
elderly. It remains in this use today.¹³
Currently, 100% of the 315 rental units are designated
Section 8, with reduced rental costs according to the
income of the renter.
The hotel houses Asian Health
Services, a community health center that offers primary health care services with 36 exam rooms and a dental clinic with 7 chairs. The center receives in excess of
100,000 patient visits per year.
The Hotel Oakland Computer Learning Center, a
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Neighborhood Network, is housed onsite and is one of the ï¬rst
computer centers in senior housing in the Bay Area.
Neighborhood Networks is a community-based initiative created by HUD in 1995. Through innovative
public/private partnerships, Neighborhood Networks
establishes multiservice community learning centers
that bring computer access and lifelong learning to
low- and moderate-income residents living in HUD
multifamily insured and assisted housing.
Photo credit: Oakland Public Library
Photo credit: Rachel Welles Photography
¹² http://www.lincolnhighwayassoc.org/ca/traveler/2004-04/hotel_oakland.shtml
¹³ https://localwiki.org/oakland/Hotel_Oakland
9
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
.
PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Newberry Hall, Detroit, Michigan
Located across the street from the Detroit Medical
Center, and originally constructed to provide housing
for nurses, the renovated Newberry Hall Apartments
consists of 28 market-rate residential units. The developers kept and rebuilt the original windows, including
the leaded glass on the ï¬rst floor. Many of the original bricks were recycled back into the building, often
featuring stamps from the original manufacturer. The
main lobby’s wood paneling and coffered ceilings were
also restored, creating a substantial ‘wow factor’ for everyone who walks through the building’s front door.¹â´
itating a number of properties in the District, not only
for residences but for artist spaces as well.
The entire
district is on the National Register of Historic Places.¹âµ
Among the environmental beneï¬ts of the Newberry
Hall rehabilitation is the installation of a geothermal
well-ï¬eld to provide renewable energy heating and
cooling to the building. Other green features include
energy star appliances, blown-in insulation, an
ultra-energy-efficient elevator and sky lights.
The $8 million project was funded through federal and
state historic and brownï¬eld tax credits, issued by the
US Department of Urban Housing and purchased by
Comerica Bank.
The New Economy Initiative contributed $2.5 million
over two years to help leverage the estimated cost of
$34 million needed to revitalize the historic Sugar Hill
Arts District, in which Newberry Hall is located. Additional funding was obtained from the City of Detroit,
the Michigan State Housing Development Authority
(MSHDA), Detroit Renaissance, Detroit Investment
Fund (now Invest Detroit) and private lenders.
Midtown Detroit, Inc. (MDI) has taken the lead in rehabil-
Photo credit: Zachary and Associates, part of the development team of Newberry Hall Development LLC
¹â´ http://www.modeldmedia.com/devnews/newberryhalldetroit121311.aspx
¹âµ http://midtowndetroitinc.org/what-we-do/community-development
10
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
. PLACEBASED INVESTING AND THE ROLE OF THE IMPACT INVESTOR
Conclusion
Perhaps, in the best of all political systems, access to
governmental assistance for such programs as those
that helped ï¬nance the aforementioned properties/initiatives could be found in a single location, and not
require hopscotching from agency to agency in order to
ï¬nd them. Furthermore, perhaps in the best of all economic systems, the idea that social and environmental
mission should align with investment strategy would
be a vision shared by all investors and not just those
who describe themselves as sustainable or impact.
While we may not live in the best of all possible systems, the efforts put forth on behalf of the nation’s
least fortunate citizens are nothing less than Herculean.
What was once crumbling testimony to the failure of
the American dream has been demonstrated to offer a
successful paradigm for true inclusiveness.
Investors who turn to CCM for their impact-based
ï¬nancial activities are part of a rejuvenation of society
through the capital markets.
Investors who turn to CCM for their impact-based
ï¬nancial activities are part of a rejuvenation of
society through the capital markets.
2500 Weston Road, Suite 101 | Weston, FL 33331 | Phone: 954-217-7999 | Fax: 954-385-9299 | www.ccmï¬xedincome.com
For more information, please contact David Sand at dsand@ccmï¬xedincome.com or Jamie Horwitz at jhorwitz@ccmï¬xedincome.com.
11
© 2015 Community Capital Management, Inc.
.