April 26, 2016 CLIENT provided in the statute,” citing two provisions that specifically included the words “with intent” when describing the violation. Until the Brownlow decision, the extent to which the MCPA was to be construed with reference to the elements of common-law fraud was unclear. While it remains to be seen whether the Brownlow decision is appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court, it provides clarification in an area that has received little attention from Michigan courts. This client alert is published by Dickinson Wright PLLC to inform our clients and friends of important developments in the field of appellate law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. We encourage you to consult a Dickinson Wright attorney if you have specific questions or concerns relating to any of the topics covered in here. FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip J.

DeRosier is a Member in Dickinson Wright’s Detroit office. He can be reached at 313.223.3866 or pderosier@dickinsonwright.com ALERT page 2 of 2 .